If you have any questions, please call us on 07779 036 691

All ABout Plagiarism from preprint of paper through the Arxiv

Recently we now have written a study paper and posted a preprint regarding the Arxiv to acquire some non-official peer review and also to raise the quality of our paper. Till now we have perhaps maybe not submitted this paper to virtually any journal or conference(it really is unpublished), but our company is enthusiastic about sending it to a meeting.

While testing our paper for plagiarism utilizing free websites, we obtained outcomes showing 83% plagiarism through the variation we posted regarding the Arxiv. This means, the program is stating that we plagiarised our very own paper. We additionally attempted pulling down our paper through the Arxiv in order to prevent this plagiarism, however it’s extremely hard. Does that suggest our paper will get refused by all seminars? Exactly exactly just What should we do?

This concern originated from our web site for professional mathematicians.

3 Responses 3

The problem as it is understood by me:

You had written a manuscript A and uploaded it into the arXiv custom papers review. That you don’t intend to publish manuscript A in a journal or conference.

You later on composed a manuscript B. you would like to submit B up to a seminar. This manuscript B shows 83% overlap with manuscript A.

Therefore, you might be concerned to possess issues with publishing manuscript B.

While both are your projects there clearly was a risk that is potential may think you will be committing self-plagiarism. (As in the event that you could you make an effort to publish both the and B in a journal or conference there may be a genuine problem.) in order to avoid this perception the status should be made by you of a definite.

You can certainly do this via:

Including a footnote to your first page of a stating that it really is a draft/technical report/etc. rather than designed for book. It is possible to consist of this remark as “comment” when you look at the meta information on arXiv.

Mentioning the draft A in your paper B, like: “an initial form of these results with additional detailed proofs can be acquired on arXiv.” or whatever fits you context.

Doing either of these should suffice, but doing both might then include safety that is extra.

(presuming there is absolutely no policy that outcomes ought not to be circulated beforehand for the meeting where you distribute. However in math this would virtually never ever end up being the instance.)

But while testing plagiarism making use of free websites we unearthed that outcomes were showing 83% plagiarism from our paper just that will be published on Arxiv.

Why did you examine your paper for plagiarism within the beginning? We have submitted about 50 documents and also have never ever done this. partly because we know haven’t committed plagiarism because I wrote the papers because I never thought of it and partly! had been you in question whether you plagiarized or otherwise not? I do not obtain it.

You correctly, you seem concerned that a plagiarism detector found your paper on the Arxiv if I understood. But that is super that is weird paper cannot plagiarize it self, and you are clearly maybe not the initial or ten-thousandth individual to publish their preprint from the Arxiv. Why would that be a challenge?

Centered on everything you said, it really is astonishing that you simply got 83% plagiarism. I assume the reason why it’s maybe maybe not 100% is you did earn some nontrivial improvements in your paper (and ignored to say that in your question). okay, so. I suggest that you upload the updated variation on the Arxiv. Then a plagiarism detectors will either determine what’s going on or report that you’ve got plagiarized 100% from the preprint with all the authors that are same name. a puzzle that perhaps the most harried meeting editor should certainly work through.

Finally, considering that the concern had been initially published on Math Overflow, i’d like to state that in math it might look ridiculous for a paper to cite its Arxiv that is own preprint. If that is really a halfway convention that is standard other areas, I would be extremely interested to see examples.


By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

I would like to receive promotional emails and offers